
This claim was based on his harm index which is a great league table of all drugs, including alcohol and tobacco based on deaths relevant to consumption.
While Prof Nutt is well within his right to air his academic concerns, he didn’t take into account the role he holds as chair of the ACMD and how their advice inputs into Government drugs policy. While the overall message from Government is that drugs are dangerous and illegal – the last thing you want one of your advisors to be saying in the media is that it’s safer to take LSD and Ecstasy than have a drink – hence the fall out begins, with yours truly involved.
As a result he was going to be asked to resign, however this wasn’t going to happen until the following Monday. This is where my bad week begins – I get a call on Friday morning confirming some interviews for Prof Nutt in his capacity as chair of the ACMD to talk about the dangers of ketamine with BBC Radio 1 on Monday. Ten minutes later Prof Nutt calls me to say I needed to cancel them as he’d been called into a meeting to talk about the repercussions to his media rant. I call my contact at BBC Radio 1 but he’s in a meeting so I fire off an email apologising and cancelling the interview. Now this journalist at BC Radio 1, I would consider a good contact, someone who I have a good, trusted working relationship with, someone who I speak with a couple of times a week – so I feel I need to offer some explanation to why I’ve had to cancel. So in the email I stated that it looked like Prof Nutt might be facing some repercussions.
My friendly contact only then passes my email onto the BBC key Home Affairs correspondent, who then blogs the Prof Nutt is facing the sack. (Link to the offending blog: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markeaston/2009/10/nutt_faces_sack.html )
This then lead to the Monday meeting to be brought forward to Friday afternoon and the Home Sec sending him a letter asking him to resign. Prof Nutt didn’t want to go quietly and has since been courting the media meaning this was the lead story in the UK media on Friday night and all over the weekend and has blow up into a politicians vs. scientist story that doesn’t seem to be running out of steam. It has lead to urgent statements in the Houses of Parliament, Prime Minister being asked questions and a whole raft of eminent scientist commenting and firing off letters to the Prime Minister via the media.
I can tell you I felt so guilty for letting this slip on Friday, I spent most of Saturday hiding under my duvet wishing this would go away, only for it to continue to still be a top story for the majority of this week. Despite Prof Nutt’s fait already confirmed when he appeared in print and broadcast on the Thursday hailing the safety of LSD, I felt that my email had gotten him sacked. I took it personally and the weight of the world was on my shoulders. I must point out that his position as chair was unpaid and he’s a highly respected brain scientist so will not be on the breadline due to being asked to resign.
With hindsight I’m feeling a little better about it and in a way my fuck up meant Prof Nutt had a good shot at the media to get his point across before any politician spoke against him. But on the down side my unblemished work record now has a nasty mark on it. The lesson learnt is never trust a journalist no matter how friendly you think you are with them.





